This is why the new liturgy so closely resembles a Protestant service. And this 23-year-old letter of Pope John Paul II has been taken as an unwelcome and unheeded suggestion by the hierarchy and clergy of Western countries. When it comes to the sacraments, extraordinary minister is classic terminology. It was not a green light for it to spread to other countries, like the United States. Whatever the case, it is clear that Communion on the tongue is of Apostolic origins (that is, taught by Christ Himself), Communion in the hand was condemned as an abuse at the Synod of Rouen in 650 A.D., and the practice of Communion in the hand is never reflected in the artwork of any period whether it be in the East or West that is, up until after the Second Vatican Council. Others maintain that it was never a Catholic custom, but if Communion in the hand was practiced in some limited way in the early Church, it was institutionalized and made widespread by the Arians as a sign of their disbelief in the Divinity of Jesus Christ. (Values is a subjective term you wont find in pre-Vatican II theology manuals). It was the indignation of large numbers of the Faithful which prompted Pope Paul VI to take some action. While the church is partly built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets (Jesus Christ being the chief cornerstone, Ephesians 2:19), the apostles and prophets serve as foundational stones, not due to an inherent holiness or sanctity unattainable for "ordinary" Christians but due to the authority given to them by Christ to receive the Holy Spirit who guided them into all truth (John 16:13), a truth which they faithfully proclaimed and recorded in the Scriptures, but which has been twisted and distorted by more than 19 centuries of the inventions and fables of men. since all of us share the one bread" (1 Corinthians 10:16-17 CSB). But the point is that the very document that permitted the seeking of an indult for Communion on the hand in very limited cases at the same time strongly advocated for Communion on the tongue, adding that it is a sign of the reverence of the faithful toward the Eucharist and is needed for the most fruitful reception of the Lords body (Memoriale Domini). Although a layman, he was also an acolyte. I find it quite enlightening. But if you think about it, there were some necessary steps that we sat in the pew and watched develop that laid the foundation for this plague of unconsecrated hands, commissioned by pastors to degrade the Eucharist, usurp the duty of those in Holy Orders, undermine the priesthood, and rob the altar of God of its sacred rights. Earlier this week, Catholic commentator John-Henry Westen, co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews, detailed five reasons why Catholics should only receive Holy Communion on the tongue. There is also the concern that some people will not consume the host if it is placed in their hand, or they will not treat the Sacrament with all the respect that is due. And it must be noted that at this time, the abuse was limited to a few European countries. The term taken at face value was used because, as some astute readers will have already noticed, the document just quoted from was loosely worded. It is a pattern we see over and over again in the modern Church: Lets violate the law, and in the end well have the violation established as local custom., This unlawful abuse is so well established as local custom that even Pope John Paul II, who made at least a paper attempt to curb the abuse, was completely unsuccessful. Get notified of the latest news from the Fatima Center, The Trump of Latin America and the Cult of the Virus. In the pre-Vatican II Church, when the Latin Tridentine Mass was the norm, men training to be priests were not only taught, but. To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. It also shows both side of the issue at hand. Did the drapes in old theatres actually say "ASBESTOS" on them? Our Catholic fathers at home, as well as our teaching Sisters in school, told us that it was sacrilegious for anyone but the priest to touch the Sacred Host. Communion in the hand was introduced under a false ecumenism, allowed to grow due to weakness in authority, approved through compromise and a false sense of toleration, and has led to profound irreverence and indifference toward the Blessed Sacrament as the commonplace liturgical abuse and the disgrace of our age. Third, because out of reverence for this Sacrament, nothing touches It but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priests hands for touching this Sacrament. Keywords: Catholic, Communion, hand, tongue. But lay-readers within the New Mass was not the only necessary step. Communion on the hand may possibly been an Apostolic Tradition. Humanae Vitae rightly reaffirmed the Churchs teaching against contraception. His feast day is celebrated on 15 August; that day is widely observed as the Feast of the Assumption, therefore he is not mentioned in the General Roman Calendar, but only in the Roman Martyrology. On the other hand, there is also ample testimony from great saints like St. While many will debate the international response to the disease, and argue over whether or not such reaction was ever justified, the fact is the COVID pandemic is incomparable to any recent outbreak of disease. Father Edward Schillebeeckx, an influential liberal theologian at Vatican II, admitted that placing deliberate ambiguity in the Council documents was a key strategy of the progressives. A true Catholic renewal would either leave these gestures of reverence intact, or enhance them. Communion in the hand to a trusting, vulnerable people was a campaign of calculated half-truths that didnt tell the whole story. Priests could have done this, but it was deemed safe if the young lad went in their stead! is a traditional Dominican priest. Can you still use Commanders Strike if the only attack available to forego is an attack against an ally? Communion with the Flesh of the Risen Christ preserves, increases and renews the life of grace received in Baptism. In The Theology of Kneeling, an excerpt from his book The Spirit of the Liturgy (2000), Cardinal Ratzinger highlights this truth: the bodily gesture itself is the bearer of the spiritual meaning when someone tries to take worship back into the purely spiritual realm and refuses to give it embodied form, the act of worship evaporates. Later, as Pope Benedict XVI, in continuity with St. John Paul II, he gave Communion to the faithful on the tongue while they knelt. For a country to apply for the indult, the following was necessary: 1) Communion in the hand had to already be presently in that country; 2) the bishops of that country had to have two-thirds majority vote in favor of Communion in the hand; 3) Communion in the hand should not be imposed in a way that would exclude the traditional manner; 4) the We cannot be certain precisely how Jesus distributed His Body to the Apostles, but it seems likely if He were to distribute the Sacrament exclusively on the tongue then a detail of such importance would be carefully recorded. Communion on the tongue displays a greater degree of reverence, and it is safer because it is less likely to result in the host, or a particle of the host falling to the floor. Given the living tradition of the Church, which highlights the most ancient practice of receiving Holy Communion in the hand, the Archbishop has the authority to instruct the faithful to receive Holy Communion in the hand during this time of Pandemic, with no exceptions. And the fad and fashion that was the pride and joy of many post-Vatican II Churchmen, in the name of making the Church more relevant, was the idea of lay-involvement in the liturgy. True. In the action of . The priest of Zeus, whose temple was just outside the town, The Protestant Minister, however, is just an ordinary man who leads the hymns, reads the lessons and gives sermons to stir up the convictions of the believers. This is exactly what happened, and this is why we have Communion in the hand today. According to Roman Catholic discipline, the Code of Canon Law does not object to the reception of Communion by Christians of these Churches (canon 844 3). Stay up to date with the latest news, information, and special offers. This unlawful abuse is so well established as local custom that even Pope John Paul II, who made at least a paper attempt to curb the abuse, was completely unsuccessful. People! the host and special warnings against such negligence as leaving it behind in the fields on return from work.3 . It must be asked, then, if this Instruction is on the books, why is Communion in the hand so prevalent? After Vatican II, some ecumenically-minded priests in Holland started giving Communion in the hand, in a monkey-see, monkey-do imitation of Protestant practice. One day, he was entrusted with the task of bringing the Eucharist to condemned Christians in prison. "Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord. you, I will not drink from this fruit of the vine from now on until For many Americans, Mass and Communion have been inaccessible due to restrictions in many places. reverence for the Blessed Sacrament is put into practice of paramount importance. In summary, the document states: The document further says the Supreme Pontiff judged that the long received manner of ministering Holy Communion to the Faithful should not be changed. It had not yet started in the United States. But unfortunately, this is precisely what happened with the supposedly anti-Communion in the hand document of 1969. In his letter Domincae Cenae of February 24, 1980, the Pope restated the Churchs teaching that to touch the sacred species and to administer them with their own hands is a privilege of the ordained. But, for whatever reason, this 1980 document contained no threat of penalty to any layman, priest or bishop who ignored the Popes plea. Basil the Great, doctor of the Church (AD 330379), would teach: The right to receive Holy Communion in the hand is permitted only in times of persecution (e.g., the laity could touch the Host to distribute it secretly). These countries hadnt been given permission to even ask for this indult. Naturally, liberal clergy in other countries (including ours) concluded that if this rebellion could be legalized in Holland, it could be legalized anywhere. Lycaonian language, The gods have come down to us in human form! We're not salespeople, but we depend on donations averaging $14.76 and fewer than 1% of readers give. But if the bishops seemed indifferent to this scandal, the laity were outraged. However, since 1969, the Holy See has granted permission to bishops' conferences who have requested it for holy Communion to be received on the hand. The Eucharist. And in instructions of this nature, lack of precision gives rise to wide interpretation, and wide interpretation gives rise to the establishment of an abuse under the appearance of fidelity to Church regulations. In verse 26 he says, "as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until He comes.". Not only should we rarely see one, but there should be many Catholics who go through their entire life without once seeing an extraordinary minister. Similarly, the Synod of Rouen (AD 650) decreed: Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman only in their mouths., The Sixth Ecumenical Council at Constantinople (AD 680681) also forbade the taking of Communion in the hand by the laity, under threat of excommunication. @KayleeA Sorry, I did not mean to imply that you were one, but I now realize that the way I phrased that might be taken that way. In all sixteen documents of Vatican II, there is no mention of Communion in the hand, nor was it mentioned during any of the debates during the Council. An interesting response to sedevacantists regarding their objections on this topic. A quick example will be found in the writings of Monsignor Champlin. It was a recognizably anti-Catholic practice rooted in disbelief in the real Presence of Christ and the priesthood. The Faithful are told that it is an optional practice, and if they dont like it, they can receive it on the tongue. Naturally, liberal clergy in other countries (including ours) concluded that if this rebellion could be legalized in Holland, it could be legalized anywhere. A majority of U.S. Catholic adults say Biden should be allowed to receive Communion during Mass, while nearly 30% say Biden should not be allowed to receive Communion. It must be explained that reception of Communion on the hand is not sinful, nor is it forbidden. The 16th Century Protestant revolutionaries (more politely but undeservedly called Protestant reformers) re-established Communion in the hand as a means of showing two things: The Protestants establishment of Communion in the hand was their way of showing their rejection of belief in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, rejection of the Sacramental Priesthood in short, to show their rejection of Catholicism altogether. condemned with the world." Federal Tax Identification Number: 81-0596847. The document had that ambiguity, imprecision and elasticity that has characterized many of the Vatican II and post-Vatican II documents. That is what the Christian should be most concerned about in the supper of the Lord. Can a communion host be made differently according to Catholicism? It is well balance and not one sided. But if the bishops seemed indifferent to this scandal, the laity were outraged. There are quotes from Church Fathers supporting both practices. But obliterating these without apology and without convincing argument, as has been the case over the last 30 years with the introduction of the New Mass, is not the mark of genuine Catholic renewal, but resembles the New Paganism warned of by Belloc, and its arrogant contempt for tradition. do not mention that permission was only to be a. where it had already been established by 1969. While pandemics have raged before, and other diseases exist, COVID is unique in our time. IF YOU LOVE ME, PLEASE DO NOT RECEIVE HOLY COMMUNION IN THE HAND, for I will Reward All Those who have STOOD FIRM and have NOT Received Holy Communion in the Hand. Then having partaken of the Body of Christ, approach also the cup of His blood; not extending your hands, but bending low and saying in the way of worship and reverence, Amen, be you sanctified by partaking, also of the blood of Christ. Catechetical Lecture 5. The office of Eucharistic minister is therefore the illegitimate offspring from the union of the New Liturgys lay involvement and Communion in the hand living together in the modern Church. But what does defile a person and cause him to come under the judgement of God is eating and drinking without recognizing the body of Christ. Todays Eucharistic Ministers actually operate in defiance of existing Vatican norms. Father Edward Schillebeeckx, an influential liberal theologian at Vatican II, admitted that placing deliberate ambiguity in the Council documents was a key strategy of the progressives. The motivation for this practice is two-fold: a) first, to avoid the dropping of Eucharistic particles [today, consecrated Hosts are regularly stolen for use in satanic Masses and other blasphemous practices even sold on eBay! Their belief that the minister of Communion is no different in any fundamental from laymen. @jaredad7 Would you consider posting a question about this. As parish churches reopen and Communion becomes available, many bishops prefer, for the safety of parishioners and clergy alike, that the faithful accept Communion in the hand. The question has been asked for a long time since the Church has often allowed both methods of reception. Both ways are permitted within the Ordinary Form of the Mass. They figured that if they ignored. Lay people started reading the Epistle, and the new responsorial psalms. This reverence shows that it is not a sharing in ordinary bread and wine that is involved, but in the Body and Blood of the Lord.. Thank you. Though there is no hard proof that the loose wording of Immensae Caritatis was done on purpose, there is ample proof that the ambiguity in the Vatican II documents was deliberate. The Protestants' establishment of Communion in the hand was their way of showing their rejection of belief in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, rejection of the Sacramental Priesthood in short, to show their rejection of Catholicism altogether. Similarly, the Synod of Rouen (AD 650) decreed: "Do not put the Eucharist in the hands of any layman or laywoman . In other words, the real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist is just a Papist superstition, and that the bread is just bread and anybody can handle it. But for us, through the grace of God, it is no puzzle. Thanks for this great effort you put through. Since Damasus compares him to Stephen, he may have been a deacon; however, a 6th-century account makes him an acolyte. The risk of touching the tongue and passing the saliva on to others is obviously a danger, however, the chance of touching someone's hand is equally probable and one's hands have a greater exposure to germs. "So, then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an 82, Art. Whereas in 1985, Communion in the hand was granted by virtue of an indult received in 1977, in the Roman Missal, Third Edition, Communion in the hand is now ordinary liturgical law for the United States, though every communicant retains the equal right of receiving on . In the NEW YORK (AP) Holy Communion will have a different look when in-person worship services resume at . robes when they heard this and rushed into the crowd, shouting, The Apostolic See therefore strongly urges bishops, priests and people to observe zealously this law.. But when Humanae Vitae was issued, there was a tidal wave of scandalous opposition from Catholic priests and Ph.D.s. That they believed there was no such thing as transubstantiation and that the bread used at Communion time was just ordinary bread. They conducted the tedious Let us pray to the Lord Lord hear our prayer Prayers of the Faithful, and even greeted us over the microphone before Mass wishing us good morning, telling us what hymns well be singing and what Eucharistic Prayer Father fancies today. Christ? When vast numbers of Catholics, then, rejected. According to Catholicism, does Welchs Grape Juice constitute valid matter for the consecration of the Mass? Why does Acts not mention the deaths of Peter and Paul? The traditional and preferred method is the reception of the Host on the tongue: Step forward and kneel at the Communion rail or station (if you stand, make a sign of reverencesuch as a bow or genuflection or Sign of the Crossbefore receiving the Host and take care not to disrupt the Communion line). worshiped him. All materials contained on this site, whether written, audible or visual are the exclusive property of Catholic Online and are protected under U.S. and International copyright laws, Copyright 2022 Catholic Online. Second, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the peoples gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people. He, Teresa Farris-Dacar is a Traditional Catholic from birth and a, Fatima Perspectives #1389 Jair Bolsonaro, President of Brazil, has been called the Trump of Latin America. Having barely, Yesterday the Vatican released the prayer (read it here) which Pope Francis will use at the consecration ceremony, Fatima Perspectives #1310 In a short address commemorating the publication of John Paul IIs Centesimus annus (1991) which, The false ecumenism which is one of the poisoned fruits of Vatican II grows like a cancer in, But the introduction of Communion in the hand and lay ministers of the Eucharist shows an arrogant disregard for what our fathers taught us. This liturgical law clarifies the Church's discipline regarding the reception of Holy Communion. St. Cyril of Jerusalem in 348 gave this instruction to his congregation: "When you approach Holy Communion, make the left hand into a throne for the right, which will receive the King. Communion on the tongue in no way detracts from the dignity of the communicant. The mindless behavior of this superficially trained laity brings to the sanctuary a pomposity that is both embarrassing and saddening to watch.. March 1995 Issue), suffice it to say that this novel ecumenical spirit which Deitrich von Hildebrand called ECUMANIA became rampant during and after Vatican II. The priest, a man who had been called by God and who had been specifically trained in the study and dispensing of the sacred mysteries had to step aside, either willingly or reluctantly, to allow unqualified, out-of-place, part-time dabblers to trespass and profane His sacred domain of sanctuary and altar. Or do only ordained priests sin, and can only they, therefore, break the bread? It is always helpful to review instructions for receiving Communion. A law without a penalty is not a law, its a suggestion. St. Marculf: Saint of the Day for Monday, May 01, 2023, To Saint Peregrine: Prayer of the Day for Monday, May 01, 2023. Because Church leaders allowed the abuse to go unchecked, the practice then spread to Germany, Belgium and France. Rome allows this by indult in the New Rite. The Canadian bishops wrote a pastoral letter supposedly in support of Humanae Vitae, but within that document the bishops used the curious phrase norms for licit dissent. Are there parishes that celebrates Novus Ordo mass in Latin? We know exactly where the sense of the sacred is found, and we cling to it with a fierce tenacity. Which was the first Sci-Fi story to predict obnoxious "robo calls"? , if the priests opposition to Communion in the hand should be fierce and firm, their opposition to Extraordinary Ministers should be even more adamant. and defied the liturgical law of the Church, this rebellion would not only be tolerated, but eventually legalized. A. Catholic renewal would either leave these gestures of reverence intact, or enhance them. He was originally buried in the Catacombs of San Callisto and the inscription by Damasus was placed later on his tomb. If you donate just $5.00, the price of your coffee, Catholic Online School could keep thriving. And in order not to continually play into the manipulating hands of the New Paganism of Modernism, then a complete, formal, unambiguous condemnation of Communion in the hand and Extraordinary Ministers is our leaders only true Catholic option. Though the entire essay will not be treated here, for the purpose of the subject at hand, it is necessary to point out the central aspect of it: the old paganism had deep respect for tradition, and the new post-Christian paganism has a revolutionary contempt for tradition. Did early Protestants consider transubstantiation to be idol worship? to the disciples, and said, Take and eat it; this is my body. Then The Fathers of the Council of Trent defined the Blessed Sacrament with precision and care. Whatever the case, it is clear that Communion on the tongue is of Apostolic origins (that is, taught by Christ Himself), Communion in the hand was condemned as an abuse at the Synod of Rouen in 650 A.D., and the practice of Communion in the hand is never reflected in the artwork of any period whether it be in the East or West that is, up until, The teaching that only the priests may touch the Sacred Host, that the priests hands are consecrated for this purpose, and that no precaution was too great to safeguard reverence and prevent desecration had been incorporated into the Liturgy of the Church; that is, the, Priests were trained in the Old Latin Mass to celebrate Mass with precise rubrics that safeguarded the reverence the Blessed Sacrament deserves. But ask they did. He cant, Though Communion in the hand was not mandated by the Second Vatican Council, what, canonized by Vatican II was Ecumenism this false spirit of counterfeit unity that had been previously condemned by the Church, particularly by Pope Pius XI in his 1928 encyclical. Before the Second Vatican Council, there is no historic record of bishops, priests or laity petitioning anyone for the introduction of Communion in the hand. They must find the courage for opposing this novel practice by remembering that even Pope Paul VI, despite his weaknesses, correctly predicted that Communion in the hand would lead to irreverence and profanation of the Eucharist, and a gradual erosion of correct doctrine and we have seen this prophecy come to pass. Many insist that they feel equal reverence when receiving in the hand, and that the key is the attitude of the heart. In fact, if it were forbidden, it seems impossible the Church would alter such an important rule. They have blocked me on their site for questioning and voicing out my opinion. The real sacrilege here would be in receiving Our Lord while in the state of mortal sin! do not make clear to the reader that the worlds bishops, when polled, voted overwhelmingly against Communion in the hand.
Private Equity Family Office London,
Carolina Bucci Bracelet Dupe,
How Do I Fight A Traffic Ticket In California?,
Michael Tierney Stuffed Puffs Net Worth,
Articles W